sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Happy Hermes-Day! Can we talk about Teiresias for a second? That whole thing with the snakes [item 3] has been bothering me.

So if you're recall, one day blind Teiresias was walking on Mount Kullene (the birthplace of Hermes), stumbled across two snakes entwined in sex, and he accidentally crushes one or both of them with his staff. Hera was infuriated at this and changed Teiresias into a woman. Teiresias becomes a priestess of Hera. At some point, Apollo advises Teiresias that if he ever happens upon the same situation to crush one or the other of the snakes with his staff; in the eighth year of being a woman, Teiresias does and is restored to his original form.

This is clearly a story about reincarnation in order to learn a particular lesson: Teiresias is each of us, Teiresias's sex-change is reincarnating into different bodies, Hera is "mother Earth" and becoming her priestess is to devote oneself to learning her lessons; Apollo is the mysteries and his advice is the mystery teachings; eight years is a "great year" representing one's greater life (Apollodoros, Library III iv §2).

All that is very straightforward, I think; the only question is, what is the lesson to be learned? It has something to do with polarity, certainly, which already puts me at a disadvantage since I'm of a monistic bent and have a difficult time making sense of dualities; but it is further complicated by the fact that almost every version of the story we possess tells it differently. I tend to trust Apollodoros more than the others, but his version is itself ambiguous, so we're on our own.

Thinking about this, though, reminded me of the Ra Material; if you're not familiar with it, it's one of the major channeled texts of the New Age movement. (Since it's a channeled text, we're already in super-grain-of-salt-territory, but bear with me.) "Ra" states that there are seven degrees of consciousness, and that each degree of consciousness has a lesson to learn in order for beings of that consciousness to move to the next degree of consciousness. First degree beings (like minerals) are static and inanimate, and their lesson is to learn to move and grow. Second degree beings (like plants and animals) are animate but unselfconscious, and their lesson is to learn individuality. We humans are third degree beings, and our lesson is to learn to relate the individual to the all. "Ra" says that there are two polarities of relating to the all: the positive pole of giving to others or compassion, and the negative pole of taking from others or selfishness; since all is one, both the love of others and the love of self are ways of loving the all, and so either way can carry one upwards, but the crucial point is to develop enough reflective capacity and will to be capable of actively choosing a path.

Of course, all models are wrong, but some are useful: true or not, "Ra's" model certainly has the merit of making sense of the snakes. The female snake is the negative pole (and let me stress that I'm not denouncing women, I am referring strictly to the inward-attracting direction of any negative pole); the male snake is the positive pole (as outward-emitting); Teiresias is doomed to reincarnation by being incapable of choosing a path (his first killing is accidental); over a great year he studies the lessons of earth, guided by the mysteries; finally, he is freed from reincarnation by choosing a path (his second killing is willed). Perhaps it even makes sense of why so many variants of the story are recorded: a "pure" version of the story, like the "Ra" material, stresses the free will of the individual to choose as they please; however, "moralistic" versions of the story might urge the individual to prefer one or the other polarity. (And I can certainly sympathize with this: I would, myself, much rather hasten to the light in love than sound the darkness in isolation.)

Penises (as emblematic of male sexuality) are really all over the mysteries, from the phalluses in the temples of Osiris to the thursoi of Dionusos. (Hell, if you haven't read De Dea Syria, there's a veritable boatload of penises in there for you.) I've always thought that's pretty weird to say the least, but if it's an injunction towards the positive pole, that would at least make some sense of it.

It is interesting to me that Hermes picked up the image of the story as his symbol, carrying always the kerukeion with it's two snakes coiling around Teiresias's cornel-wood staff, topped by the wings which the development of will grants. It is interesting that this became Hermes's symbol even though Athena also figures prominently in the Teiresias myth; we see just the opposite in the Perseus myth, where Perseus is guided by both gods, but only Athena took her symbol—the head of Medousa affixed to a shield—from there.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

ἠδ᾽ Ἔρος, ὃς κάλλιστος ἐν ἀθανάτοισι θεοῖσι,
λυσιμελής, πάντων δὲ θεῶν πάντων τ᾽ ἀνθρώπων
δάμναται ἐν στήθεσσι νόον καὶ ἐπίφρονα βουλήν.

and Love, who is the most beautiful of the deathless gods,
who relaxes the limbs; of every gods' and mortals'
hearts, minds, and careful plans, he conquers.

(Hesiod, Theogony 120–2, as translated—hopefully not too badly!—by yours truly.)


κάλλιστος is a tricky word, here; it is generally translated "most beautiful," but my dictionary seems to give the sense of "most good" in general—most good in form (hence "most beautiful"), most good in disposition ("kindliest"), most good in worthiness ("noblest"), etc. I'm not really sure in which sense it is meant, if indeed those of Hesiod's day would have distinguished them at all. Plotinus, at least, considered all superlatives (beauty, truth, etc.) to coincide in the Intellect.

I fear making sense of this is beyond my present capacities, but that doesn't make it any less worthy of a topic for meditation. Similarly, it is worth considering why Hesiod and Empedocles place Love at the top of their hierarchies, above even kingly Zeus.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

For all the time I've spent lately on the deeds of Akhilles and the cunning of Odusseus, it is worth noting that the only Homeric example of avoiding Haides is the love of Menelaos:

σοι δ᾽ οὐ θέσφατόν ἐστι, διοτρεφὲς ὦ Μενέλαε,
Ἄργει ἐν ἱπποβότῳ θανέειν καὶ πότμον ἐπισπεῖν,
ἀλλά σ᾽ ἐς Ἠλύσιον πεδίον καὶ πείρατα γαίης
ἀθάνατοι πέμψουσιν, ὅθι ξανθὸς Ῥαδάμανθυς,
τῇ περ ῥηίστη βιοτὴ πέλει ἀνθρώποισιν:
οὐ νιφετός, οὔτ᾽ ἂρ χειμὼν πολὺς οὔτε ποτ᾽ ὄμβρος,
ἀλλ᾽ αἰεὶ Ζεφύροιο λιγὺ πνείοντος ἀήτας
Ὠκεανὸς ἀνίησιν ἀναψύχειν ἀνθρώπους:
οὕνεκ᾽ ἔχεις Ἑλένην καί σφιν γαμβρὸς Διός ἐσσι.

"But it is not ordained for you, blessed Menelaos,
to die and meet your end in pastoral Argos,
but to the Elusion plain at earth's end
the immortals will send you, where auburn Rhadamanthus is,
where life is easiest for men—
neither snow nor heavy storms nor rain,
but always gusts of Zephuros's whistling breezes
Okeanos sends up to refresh men—
because you have Helene and they consider you Zeus's family."

(Proteus speaking. Homer, Odyssey IV 561–9, as translated—hopefully not too badly!—by yours truly.)

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Thence the human being rushes up through the cosmic framework, at the first zone surrendering the energy of increase and decrease; at the second evil machination, a device now inactive; at the third the illusion of longing, now inactive; at the fourth the ruler's arrogance, now freed of excess; at the fifth unholy presumption and daring recklessness; at the sixth the evil impulses that come from wealth, now inactive; and at the seventh zone the deceit that lies in ambush. And then, stripped of the effects of the cosmic framework, the human enters the region of the ogdoad; he has his own proper power, and along with the blessed he hymns the father. Those present there rejoice together in his presence, and, having become like his companions, he also hears certain powers that exist beyond the ogdoadic region and hymn god with sweet voice. They rise up to the father in order and surrender themselves to the powers, and, having become powers, they enter into god. This is the final good for those who have received knowledge: to be made god.

(Corpus Hermeticum I "Poimandres" xxv ff., as translated by Brian P. Copenhaver.)


Nor was Mercury negligent in the performance of her commands; for, running every where, through all nations, he cried her in the following words: "IF ANY ONE CAN SEIZE IN HER FLIGHT, OR DISCOVER WHERE A FUGITIVE PRINCESS, A SERVANT OF VENUS, AND OF THE NAME OF PSYCHE, LIES CONCEALED, LET HIM OR HER BRING WORD TO MERCURY AT THE TEMPLE OF VENUS MURTIA, AND RECEIVE, AS A REWARD OF THE DISCOVERY, SEVEN SWEET KISSES FROM VENUS HERSELF, AND ONE MORE SWEETLY HONEYED BY THE THRUST OF HER ALLURING TONGUE."

(Apuleius, The Golden Ass VI, as translated by Thomas Taylor with edits by yours truly.)


I always thought the reward of Venus for the capture of Psyche was cute, but I recently realized that it is actually brilliant and my estimation of Apuleius continues to increase. Psyche turned herself in and Venus (eventually) gave her the promised reward: sweet release from the dominion of the spheres of the seven planets and the more-honey-sweet-by-far contact with the eighth sphere of the fixed stars.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

The first men on earth to receive knowledge of the gods, and to build temples and shrines and to summon meetings for religious observances are said to have been the Egyptians. They were the first, too, to take cognizance of holy names, and to repeat sacred traditions. Not long after them the Assyrians heard from the Egyptians their doctrines as to the gods, and they reared temples and shrines: in these they placed statues and images.

(Pseudo-Lucian, On the Syrian Goddess II.)


Okay, this is wild-eyed speculation, but hear me out.

The original mystery cult was that of Isis and Osiris. This cult got around, but everyone interpreted it differently, and consequently you ended up with multiple competing chains of transmission, and by the time they all got to Greece, prospective initiates had quite an array of Mysteries to choose from. This was itself mythologized in the Judgement of Paris: the golden apple is the soul, but the three goddesses contending for the apple are representative of the ways in which the cult teachings were interpreted, and how a prospective initiate (Paris) would have to select between them.

The first line of transmission focuses on devotion and participation in mythic relationships, hence is symbolized by Aphrodite. The initiate would gain "the love of the most beautiful girl in the world," that is, the consideration of some divinity who would remain mindful of the them and support them after death. (I think, here, of how Aphrodite is always whisking Her own from the killing fields of Troy.) Cults and myths in this line of transmission include:

  • Inana's Descent to the Netherworld (Sumer)
  • Ishtar's Descent to the Netherworld (Assyria)
  • Cult of Astarte (Phoenecia)
  • Aphrodite and Adonis (Greece by way of Cyprus)

The second line of transmission focuses on understanding reality and using that understanding to transcend human existence, hence is symbolized by Athena. The initiate would gain knowledge which would allow them to navigate the after-death world in such a way as to avoid reincarnating. Cults and myths in this line of transmission include:

  • Theseus and the Minotaur (Crete)
  • Cult of Dionysus (Greece by way of Crete? Note how Dionysus marries Ariadne, suggesting a claim of legitimate succession to the Minoan cult.)
  • Cult of Orpheus (Greece by way of Cyprus? Note how Orpheus was torn to shreds by Mainads, suggesting competition with the cult of Dionysus.)
  • The Epic Cycle (Greece. Note how the whole stupid thing is Odysseus' fault (but that Aphrodite is repeatedly blamed and belittled, suggesting competition with Her cult), and that his return home is effected through his cleverness and the intervention of Athena.)
  • Cupid and Psyche (Rome)

The third line of transmission focuses on overcoming one's limitations through the development of one's inherent (but latent) divine powers, hence is symbolized by Hera. The initiate would gain power and mastery over the world (by gaining power and mastery over themselves). Cults and myths in this line of transmission include:

  • Cult of Gilgamesh (Sumer, Assyria. Note how Gilgamesh spurns Ishtar, while Dumuzid embraces Her, suggesting competition with that cult.)
  • The Labors of Heracles (Greece)
  • The Cult of Orion (Greece, and especially Boeotia)
  • Jason and the Argonauts (Greece)

Finally, there are a great many myths that touch on these themes and so are part of the general framework, but don't explicitly teach a way out and so are more basic, introductory, or universalizing:

  • The Garden of Eden (Canaan)
  • The Eleusinian Mysteries (Greece)
  • Narcissus (Greece)
  • Parable of the Prodigal Son (Judea)

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

A soldier named Nobushige came to Hakuin, and asked: "Is there really a paradise and a hell?"

"Who are you?" inquired Hakuin.

"I am a samurai," the warrior replied.

"You, a soldier!" exclaimed Hakuin. "What kind of ruler would have you as his guard? Your face looks like that of a beggar."

Nobushige became so angry that he began to draw his sword, but Hakuin continued: "So you have a sword! Your weapon is probably much too dull to cut off my head."

As Nobushige drew his sword Hakuin remarked: "Here open the gates of hell!"

At these words the samurai, perceiving the master's discipline, sheathed his sword and bowed.

"Here open the gates of paradise," said Hakuin.

(Nyogen Senzaki, 101 Zen Stories LVII "The Gates of Paradise.")


Alone in immunity from magic is he who, though drawn by the alien parts of his total being, withholds his assent to their standards of worth, recognizing the good only where his authentic self sees and knows it, neither drawn nor pursuing, but tranquilly possessing and so never charmed away. [...] Thus this universe of ours is a wonder of power and wisdom, everything by a noiseless road coming to pass according to a law which none may elude—which the base man never conceives though it is leading him, all unknowingly, to that place in the All where his lot must be cast—[but] which the just man knows, and, knowing, sets out to the place he must, understanding, even as he begins the journey, where he is to be housed at the end, and having the good hope that he will be with gods.

(Plotinus, Enneads IV vi "Problems of the Soul (2)" §44–5.)


If you're losing the game, try instead playing the different game that is one level up.

(Mark Dominus.)


Have you ever played Nicky Case's little explanatory toy The Evolution of Trust? If you haven't, you should.

I think Case makes an error, by equating the Golden Rule with the "tit-for-tat" strategy; the Golden Rule isn't about treating others the way you are treated, it is rather about treating others the way you wish to be treated. Therefore, the Golden Rule is more of a mirror: if one is kind, then the Golden Rule is the "Always Cooperate" strategy, while if one is cynical, then the Golden Rule is the "Always Cheat" strategy.

As Case demonstrates, "Always Cooperate" never seems to survive. (And is destroyed all the more rapidly in times like these where "Always Cheat" is on the ascendant!) And yet, we try to be good and kind anyway. Why is that?

Is it because "Always Cooperate" is the strategy of angels? If one wishes to be among them, it makes sense to practice in preparation...

Gold

Jun. 17th, 2024 12:42 pm
sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Socrates. [...] I think, indeed, that [Hesiod] calls [dæmons] a "golden race," not as naturally composed from gold, but as being beautiful and good: but I infer this, from his denominating our race an "iron" one.

(Plato, Cratylus 397e)


When asked how men might live most virtuously and most justly, Thales said, "If we never do ourselves what we blame in others."

(Diogenes Laertius, The Lives and Opinions of the Eminent Philosophers I ii "Thales" §19)


One wonders if the "golden race" is "golden" because they practice the "golden rule?"

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

For dæmons do not assist all indifferently, but as when men swim at sea, those standing on the shore merely view in silence the swimmers who are still far out distant from land, whereas they help with hand and voice alike such as have come near, and running along and wading in beside them bring them safely in, such too, my friends, is the way of dæmons: as long as we are head over ears in the welter of worldly affairs and are changing body after body, like conveyances, they allow us to fight our way out and persevere unaided, as we endeavor by our own prowess to come through safe and reach a haven; but when in the course of countless births a soul has stoutly and resolutely sustained a long series of struggles, and as her cycle draws to a close, she approaches the upper world, bathed in sweat, in imminent peril and straining every nerve to reach the shore,​ God holds it no sin for her dæmon to go to the rescue, but lets whoever will lend aid. One dæmon is eager to deliver by his exhortations one soul, another another, and the soul on her part, having drawn close, can hear, and is thus saved; but if she pays no heed, she is forsaken by her dæmon and comes to no happy end.

(Plutarch on the Dæmon of Socrates 593F–594A, as translated by Phillip H. De Lacy and Benedict Einarson)

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Let your mind be dispassionate, and your heart, compassionate.

sdi: Digital image of the zodiac superimposed on a color wheel. (astrology)

Porphyry says, "all things are in all, but each in a manner consonant with the essence of each." I was considering this today, and think it would be a worthy exercise to take a symbol from a given system and consider its reflection in every other symbol, since these do not exist in isolation.

As an example, consider "love" in the context of astrology. Normally, we would consider this to be the domain of Venus, but that is too simplistic, I think; each planet is capable of ruling the fifth house (pleasure, children) or sixth house (employees) or seventh house (spouse) or eleventh house (friends), and so the nature of one's love for the things of a given house can vary depending on the ruler. I don't pretend to be an expert in astrology, but considering love through the lens of each planet, I might suggest each as follows:

  • Moon: lust
  • Mercury: mutual understanding
  • Venus: romance
  • Sun: compassion
  • Mars: protection
  • Jupiter: provision
  • Saturn: duty

All of these things are parts of love, but none of them are the whole of love. I think if one is attempting to really master a symbolic system, it is worth taking the time to consider each of these facets for each of the symbols in the system...

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

I went out for a walk to do my prayers this morning. While I was walking, I heard an awful croak above me. I turned to look and ducked just in time, as a crow nearly struck me as it was chased by a dove. I watched them scuffle for a few moments before the crow finally flew off, apparently defeated.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)


Guillaume Seignac, Venus and Cupid

I seem to remember a story—perhaps in one of Alan Watts's books?—in which some English poet or other was asked, "What is heaven?" He got up from his chair, crossed to the window, opened the curtain, and gestured to the children playing in the field across the street. "That," he said, "that is heaven." I wish I could locate the reference today.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Plato (in the Symposium) and Plotinus (in III v "On Love" and VI ix "On the Good") made a pretty big deal of the distinction between vulgar love and heavenly love, treating the former as being of the sensible world and the latter as being of the intelligible world, and therefore capital-B Better. But I'm not so sure this is so: is it not the case that the nature of the sensible world is separation, while the nature of the intelligible world is unity?

This would lead me to expect that while there are many kinds of love here in the sensible world, all of them should blend together into a harmonious whole There in the intelligible world. Here we speak of physical sex, emotional affection, imaginal devotion; but There, Love is all of these at once and more. Here, we have Aphrodite Pandemos and Aphrodite Ourania; but There, there is only Aphrodite.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

As an exercise, I have attempted an interpretation of each point in the myth of Cupid and Psyche. I am starting, here, from the knowledge that Apuleius was both an initiate of the Mysteries (those of Dionysus and Isis for sure, and possibly others) and a Platonist. Further, it seems to me that since versions of the tale of the Golden Ass are known to predate Apuleius, but the fable of Cupid and Psyche is not, that Apuleius intentionally retold a popular story but inserted a fable of his own construction in order to more widely disseminate the Mysteries while not breaking his oaths of silence; but more than that, it's plausible that he gave the fable a firmly Platonist slant which may not have been present in the original Mystery teachings.

However, some caveats are in order: I am a half-baked scholar at best, I have not studied Plato very deeply, and neither am I very familiar with the middle Platonists besides Apuleius and Numenius. I have relied heavily on Plotinus in my unpacking, but this almost certainly contains a number of assumptions that Apuleius would not have made, and I am unfortunately blind to those. Thomas Taylor also gives an interpretation of the fable, but he departs even more widely, being firmly wedded (as in all things) to Proclus. In some instances I have agreed with him, and in others I have disagreed; but while I figure we're both correct in the broad strokes, we probably both fall short of apprehending the fable exactly. In any event, right or wrong, this is an attempt to understand the myth by what it meant to the Hellenistic Platonists, and it does not necessarily represent my own personal beliefs.

I have placed the interpretation below a cut, as it is lengthy and in case you wish to avoid it (for example, if you want to attempt your own study without contamination). Read more... )

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Cupid and Psyche is obviously an allegory of the descent and reascent of the soul, and keys to unlocking it can be found in Plato's Republic and Symposium and Plotinus' Enneads (III v, VI ix). But it is helpful to have an outline of the fable so one can unpack it, point by point. On this day of Venus, in the hopes of helping any who are interested in hazarding the attempt, here is a first draft of such an outline—I do not believe I have missed any salient points, but I'll do another pass over it at some point to double-check (and welcome any corrections in the comments)!

Going through the story like this, so as to pick out each important feature, was a very valuable exercise! There were a number of points in the story that I hadn't noticed or paid much attention to, and which are crucial to the philosophy behind it.


  1. A king and queen have three beautiful daughters. The youngest and loveliest daughter is named Psyche.

  2. The multitude worships Psyche instead of Venus.

  3. Venus is enraged and summons Cupid to punish Psyche by causing her to fall in love with the most wretched of men.

  4. Cupid is enchanted with Psyche, pricks Himself with one of His arrows, and resolves to marry her.

  5. Psyche's sisters are happily married. Psyche, worshipped only from afar, sorrows her loneliness and hates her beauty.

  6. Psyche is told in an oracle that she is to be wed to a monster fearsome even to Jove. Her family laments and her wedding is celebrated as if it were a funeral, but Psyche resigns herself to her fate.

  7. Psyche is left alone on a lofty mountain. Zephyr carries her to a richly decorated palace in a beautiful valley.

  8. Psyche discovers that the palace is hers by marriage and is filled with servants which she can hear but not see. She enjoys the palace.

  9. Cupid and Psyche are illicitly wed. Cupid comes to Psyche every night, but always leaves before morning and Psyche never sees Him.

  10. Psyche's family is in mourning.

  11. Cupid warns Psyche against her sisters. Psyche sorrows her loneliness and begs permission to see her sisters and give them gifts. Cupid consents on the condition that Psyche tell her sisters nothing of Him and that she never attempt to look at Him.

  12. Psyche entertains her sisters at her palace and gives them lavish gifts. The sisters inquire after her husband, but Psyche keeps Him a secret. The sisters burn with envy and resolve to destroy her.

  13. Cupid tells Psyche that she is pregnant, and again warns her against her sisters, saying that if she keeps Him a secret from them, the child will be divine; but if she reveals Him, the child will be mortal. Psyche rejoices.

  14. Psyche again entertains her sisters at her palace. The sisters again inquire after her husband, but Psyche keeps Him a secret. Psyche's sisters nonetheless deduce that she has married a god and burn with greater envy.

  15. Psyche's sisters convince her that her husband is a monster and urge her to take a lamp and a dagger in the middle of the night, look upon him, and slay him. Psyche is tormented by fear and worry.

  16. Psyche discovers her husband is Cupid and intentionally pricks herself with one of His arrows. Cupid awakens, sees that his wife has broken her promise, admonishes her, and takes flight.

  17. Psyche throws herself into a river, intending to kill herself, but the river carries her to a riverbank downstream.

  18. Psyche meets Pan. Pan advises her to cease attempting suicide, lay aside her sorrow, and instead assuage Cupid through worship.

  19. Psyche wanders. She chances to meet her sisters, one after the other, telling them that her husband was Cupid, and that, as punishment for her attempted murder, banished her and would wed the sister, instead. Each sister, blind with lust, rushes to Cupid's palace and dies.

  20. A seagull gossips Cupid and Psyche's story to Venus. Venus is scandalized. She berates Cupid and locks Him in a room, but is prevented from punishing Him further through the intervention of Ceres and Juno.

  21. Psyche wanders. She eventually chances upon a temple of Ceres and a temple of Juno, one after the other, and beseeches aid. Ceres and Juno each refuse, but do not detain Psyche.

  22. Venus summons Mercury to proclaim to all that She has placed a bounty on Psyche. Psyche hears of it and hastens to the temple of Venus.

  23. Venus taunts and torments Psyche.

  24. Venus assigns Psyche the task of sorting a large heap of mixed grains under a severe time limit. Psyche is stupified by the enormity of the task. A colony of ants take pity on Psyche and complete the task for her.

  25. Venus assigns Psyche the task of collecting fleece from a flock of violent sheep. Psyche attempts to drown herself in a neighboring river, but a reed takes pity on Psyche and advises her on how to complete the task safely, and she does so.

  26. Venus assigns Psyche the task of filling a jar from a Stygian spring guarded by fierce dragons. The spring advises Psyche not to make the attempt and she is petrified with fear. An eagle takes pity on Psyche and fills the jar for her.

  27. Venus assigns Psyche the final task of taking a box to Hades and asking Proserpine to fill it with some of Her beauty. Psyche climbs a lofty tower with the intent of jumping from its top, but the tower takes pity on Psyche and advises her on how to complete the task safely, even amid traps laid by Venus, and she does so.

  28. Anxious to be reunited with Cupid and hopeful of claiming a little of the beauty within, Psyche opens the box before delivering it to Venus; however, the box contains only death. Psyche dies.

  29. Cupid escapes confinement, puts death back into its box, and awakens Psyche with one of his arrows.

  30. Psyche delivers the box to Venus.

  31. Cupid pleads his case to Jove. Jove summons all the gods and legitimates Cupid and Psyche's marriage.

  32. Psyche is fetched to Olympus and given ambrosia, making her divine. A wedding feast is held.

  33. Psyche bears Cupid a daughter, whom they name Pleasure.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

Soul bears Love a daughter whom Apuleius calls Voluptas. Lewis and Short translate this as "satisfaction, enjoyment, pleasure, or delight," either sensual or spiritual.

Every source I've seen equates Her with Hedone ("sensual pleasure"), but I think this is wrong: Apuleius was a Platonist (not an Epicurean), and She is only born after Soul evolves (not before). Rather, I wonder if Voluptas was an attempt to render Eudaimonia ("well-being, happiness") in Latin.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

In the fable of Cupid and Psyche, Psyche is required to undertake various tasks on behalf of Venus in order to reascend from the sensible world to the intellectual world. Each of these is meant to destroy her, but each time, she receives aid:

  • Her first task is to sort a large pile of seeds and grains by type under severe time constraints. She is aided by a colony of ants, a creature of the earth.

  • Her second task is to collect fleece from a flock of man-eating sheep. She is advised by a reed, a creature of the water.

  • Her third task is to fill a pitcher from a Stygian spring guarded by fierce dragons. She is aided by an eagle, a creature of the air.

  • Her fourth task is to descend to Hades and fetch some of Proserpine's beauty. She is advised by an tower enchanted by a spirit, a creature of fire.

That the elements give aid to Psyche is an obscure way of saying that our sojourn here in the sensible world is governed by Providence: it is not a punishment for sin but rather how we learn to apprehend Love.

The tasks themselves, too, are representative of what we need to learn in the body: the tedium of manual labor (growing and managing of grain), the crafts of civilized life (animal husbandry and the spinning of wool), the mastery of social custom (the Styx is representative of oaths), and finally the overcoming of death itself (going to and returning alive from Hades).

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

I just noticed something. In his Life of Plotinus, Porphyry notes that he became suicidal after some years in Rome:

I myself at one period had formed the intention of ending my life; Plotinus discerned my purpose; he came unexpectedly to my house where I had secluded myself, told me that my decision sprang not from reason but from mere melancholy and advised me to leave Rome. I obeyed and left for Sicily, which I chose because I heard that one Probus, a man of scholarly repute, was living there not far from Lilybæum. Thus I was induced to abandon my first intention but was prevented from being with Plotinus between that time and his death.

Plotinus mostly only wrote his essays because Amelius and Porphyry nagged him so, but Porphyry indicates that he continued to mail essays to him while he was in Sicily:

The following five [essays] Plotinus wrote and sent to me while I was living in Sicily, where I had gone about the fifteenth year of Gallienus:

  1. On True Happiness [I 4]
  2. On Providence (1) [III 2]
  3. On Providence (2) [III 3]
  4. On the Knowing Hypostases and the Transcendent [V 3]
  5. On Love [III 5]

Do you notice anything about these? The first three are encouragement for Porphyry, and the latter two are a reminder of what work remains ahead of him.

This seems to me to be a reminder that Plotinus—certainly no intellectual weakling—believed Reason is, and ought to be, in the service of Love.

sdi: Photograph of the title page of Plotinus' "The Six Enneads." (enneads)

III 5: On Love

Love is simply the action of the soul: when we say that soul moves in orbits, the soul is the lover, the focus of the orbit the beloved, and the gravitational attraction binding one to the other is desire.

This is what is meant when the Theologists speak of Aphrodite: Aphrodite Ourania is the highest divine Soul itself, being the daughter of Kronos, the highest divine Mind. Aphrodite Pandemos is a lower divine soul, being the daughter of Zeus, the demiurge. Eros, said to be Aphrodite's son, is the desire that prompts Her motion.

Lower souls act in imitation of these higher ones: we have spoken of this process already, and this is why Eros is said by Plato to be a dæmon: He is the production of a soul, and a production must be of a lower category. In this sense, Eros is not one but many: just as superdivine Aphrodite begets a divine Eros, so too does a divine soul—like our own—beget a dæmonic Eros in imitation of Her.

So too does Plato speak of Poverty and Plenty and the garden of Zeus and so on: these are not meant literally, but as metaphors for this process by which the soul imitates and strives toward the Good.

I think it's elegant how Plotinus makes Ouranos to be that which is beyond, Kronos to be the definition of Beauty, Aphrodite Ourania is the most beautiful thing so defined, and Eros to be the mediator by which She operates, weaving all the while a fractal universe out of this. (The above is the hypercosmic order; the same process repeats a level down to produce the cosmic; the same process repeats a level down to produce the microcosmic; etc.) In a sense, Plotinus' whole philosophy is a philosophy of Love. Plotinus' own discussion of this is in §§2–4.

As for Plato, well, Diotima did say that she was speaking of the "higher mysteries" of Love, so I guess Plotinus is justified in taking her words to be veiled. Still, as an open and frank person, I rather dislike it. Plotinus' unpacking of Plato begins in §5.

sdi: Oil painting of the Heliconian Muse whispering inspiration to Hesiod. (Default)

The next chapter of the Enneads is about Love, and in it, Plotinus repeatedly refers back to Diotima's discourse on Love, as quoted by Socrates, as quoted by Plato in the Symposium. I thought it worthwhile to quote it here (Benjamin Jowett's translation), since it seems a necessary prerequisite to that chapter, and it's be good to take some time to digest it before we get to Plotinus:

Read more... )

(To be honest, I find quite a lot of fault with it. So, too, does Plotinus, and he goes to some length to distill the overarching principles from it.)