Date: 2021-12-29 05:50 pm (UTC)
temporaryreality: (Default)
Well, this time I am so late to respond to this post that you've already got this week's up. For what it's worth, I've got two points to consider on this passage (the second will be embedded further below where I think it's better placed).

I note the opening sentence found in Taylor never finishes its idea:

"But there is a certain power subordinate to essence, but prior to soul; from essence indeed deriving its being, but perfecting soul, in the same manner as the sun perfects corporeal light."

Do the fine commentators here agree with Murray that this is referring to "Intellectual Nature" and do you feel this is an accurate translation of the Greek? I suppose this is what [personal profile] boccaderlupo refers to by "the various hypostases that exist between..."

I'm less than convinced (purely subjectively, from an inner sweep of what "feels right" [so, take that with a salt-lick]) that "intellectual nature" is what's between Being and Soul, but then again, I'm in preschool. It smacks somewhat of human exceptionalism and a failure of imagination to put intellect at the apex. I'm wondering what purpose this "Intellectual Nature" fulfills, and whether it's not far more MORE than what that term implies.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930