Thank you both for this. But what does it mean for Mind or Soul to be moving? (I would have assumed that, as the animating process, Soul to be the thing that "gives rise" to motion, and so only things "below" or "contained within" it to be mobile.) Further, why is Mind considered to be more complete than Soul? (Are they not both Gods, and therefore both self-complete?)
(Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself and should simply dig into these next week, where they appear in the text itself...)
Might be something for you folks who are taking up the Sacred Geometry.
Ha! You know, I never considered sacred geometry to have anything to do with motion or change: it seemed to me to be representative of eternally static properties of numbers. Of course, one actually has to do the constructions... for some reason, I always considered that a metaprocess or epiphenomenon having nothing essential to do with the geometry itself. Maybe I've been a computer programmer for too long—we maintain very strict boundaries between "code" and "data" :)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2021-12-09 05:49 pm (UTC)(Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself and should simply dig into these next week, where they appear in the text itself...)
Ha! You know, I never considered sacred geometry to have anything to do with motion or change: it seemed to me to be representative of eternally static properties of numbers. Of course, one actually has to do the constructions... for some reason, I always considered that a metaprocess or epiphenomenon having nothing essential to do with the geometry itself. Maybe I've been a computer programmer for too long—we maintain very strict boundaries between "code" and "data" :)