Yes, my mistake. It's prop 103, which in the edition of E.R. Dodds, appears on page 93. Whoops! (Dodds' index is keyed to the page numbers rather than the proposition numbers, which encouraged my mistake.)

To your more substantive point: Does is help to use the metaphor of a hologram? In my (admittedly limited) understanding, a hologram contains an image of, and can project outward, the entire complex system, but each hologram will nonetheless be unique, based on the point in the system where it's located. In other words, lots of *different* holograms, all of which contain the entirety of the very same complex system.