Yes! I read his footnotes and I think "Oh gosh, who do I need to read to be able to know what he's talking about?" I'm working through his version of Sallust and I sense there's a whole tradition and subtext I need to be familiar with to even know what's meant by basic words like soul, opinion, intellect, providence... because what I think those words mean isn't necessarily what they mean.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)